长春

集团 北京 上海 广州 天津 深圳 南京 苏州 宁波 成都 武汉 无锡 南通 长沙 西安 沈阳 济南 青岛 昆明 重庆 加盟校区 查找更多校区>>
来环球,去全球!
4000431134
您所在的位置: 首页 > 考前解析
考前解析

3.8雅思写作回顾

2014-03-15

来源:

小编: 247
摘要:

201438日雅思写作

 TASK1:

 流程图:compare 3 different recruitment methods;

 TASK2:

Some people think young people should be required to have full time education until they are at least 18 years old. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

I completely agree with the notion that teenagers should attend compulsory full-time education until they are adults.

From employment perspective, staying in school learning more knowledge, young people are more likely to find a better job. Most job recruiters constantly focus on the job candidates with better qualifications. Moreover, prolonged education means youngsters have more access to acquiring various skills and subjects which are indispensable for their holistic development and their employment prospects.

In terms of society, longer education till 18 will contribute significantly to less adolescence delinquency and fighting poverty. If young people stay in school for a longer time, it is less likely for them to exposed to social evils which, more often result in crimes and social violence. Besides, the youth who tend to enter society earlier are commonly from a impoverished background and what they need is to be taught about dedication and hard work in school which serves as a main tool to get rid of poverty.  

有规划 更自信

1V1免费课程规划指导